# Records: [Texmaster] Special/Sudden Ti - 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time ; Fading ROLL

Thread in 'Competition' started by Amnesia, 27 Mar 2008.

1. ### batfly

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Thanks Amnesia, here is the video thanks to Kevin, seems I can not find the password anywhere, so

2. ### batfly

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Video again later I guess. Easier to set records like this though, pressure off.

3. ### Ai

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Woah faster with even less tetrises than before. Almost first place in the 0-300 and 0-500 time attack leaderboards!

4. ### KevinDDR

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Great job!

5. ### AmnesiaPiece of Cake

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

It is totaly insane. It is probably as fast as ZAB, KAN or 309, but without the Tetrises.
I am not sure if I have asked you but can you remind me how old are you batfly ?

6. ### Kasumi

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

There's also the total lack of hold. It's never used.

7. ### aperturegrillz

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

( ﾟДﾟ)

8. ### batfly

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Thanks alot for the kind words everyone, but I think you are really overestimating my speed by far Amnesia. Sure if my stacking was good and consistent it would reduce time alot, but nowhere near enough to be in the same league of speed as those listed by you I don't think.

I'm not that technical in my game analysis though, so you people probably know better.

Sorry for the late reply, been having some problems with myself and what not. As soon as I have it all sorted out I will get the new video up aswell.

Anyways, as much as it pains me to say it, I have gone into my 23rd year fairly recently.

9. ### AmnesiaPiece of Cake

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Thank you...It seems that I am not really wrong with my theory..
C_t completly disapeared, I am in a real stagnation, and jago is turning completly mad and should finish in a psychiatric hospital soon..

You will reach our state one day young players...

I wish I had 16 years old when I discovered this game, and not 20.

10. ### COL

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

How old are japanese top players? (Kan-Jin-777-309 ...)
edit: well 777 doesn't play m-roll (nor TI?)

11. ### aperturegrillz

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

KAN is 22, I think. SQR is 17. Don't know about the others.

12. ### Ai

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

I know KAN is 23. I've never asked SQR, but according to his YouTube channel he's 27. However I recently read via his Twitter account that he was born in 1993 so TWF's probably right. Maybe jago knows more since he met some of the Japanese players. I assume most will be between 20 and 30/35.

As for whether 777 practices invisible, I think it's very doubtful. I once saw pictures of him playing Ti while covering the 2 extra next pieces and not using hold. I think that says it all. His TAP Master record is m in 07:18:76 and among the records he submitted on the TETRiS-HOLiC website there's no slower Gm. The fastest ever time is Gm in 07:18:25 by CAA which is still very close.

Personally, I believe there's little use in comparing players with invisible skills with those that play faster. Although I respect the official TGM leaderboards, I believe in the end what truly matters is speed.

13. ### aperturegrillz

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Ai, I think there were a few typos in your post... Don't you mean there's no "faster" Gm? And the time you have for CAA is faster than 777's.

14. ### Ai

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Okay that was a bad sentence and I made a mistake. Let me rephrase that and sorry for the confusion. What I did was check whether there was a slower Gm time among 777's submitted records. This is actually stupid because if he achieved Gm it would have been on the leaderboard.

The fastest time in TAP Master on the TETRiS-HOLiC site is Gm in 07:18:25 by CAA which is slightly faster than 777's 07:18:76 m. The highest ranked performance on the ranking is ann's Gm in 07:27:43.

15. ### batfly

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

500 in 01:56:48 with 7 tetrises, game end at 794 with no more tetrises after 500.

I took screenshots, but why bother. Unfortunately sav-file was full or whatever the hell, so no replay, biz as usual and so on.

When I get a 2min break that has a survival past 1000 I will party hard.

Second thought, here is a pic I guess: http://i54.tinypic.com/330tw5x.png

2nd edit: Whoa, that actually puts me above DIGITAL, sweet. Although he is probably faster by now.

Last edited: 9 Mar 2011
16. ### Ai

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Congratulations taking first place without using hold.

17. ### AmnesiaPiece of Cake

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Still not able to beat my fluky TI SHIRASE at 2:02, with his fat lag, anyway, here is my current best on sudden ti in vidéo :

Code:
..4--Amnesia -------- 2:05:36    26:65    25:68    26:20    20:10    26:73


18. ### kx5

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

(Old record from about a month ago)

I was stuck at 99 for few seconds; I definitely could've broken 2:00. My stacking was pretty ugly this game, maybe next time I'll put up a video. I haven't posted a record in a while, but I just thought it'd be nice to give Amnesia some friendly competition

19. ### AmnesiaPiece of Cake

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

Code:
..5--Amnesia -------- 2:03:03    28:10    22:10    25:86    23:81    23:15
Bastard, don't worry I will give you some competition, I feel offensive these days for breaking 2min..

By the way I have just set mine at 2:03 now, just before seeing your most.
I will make a video because it is also my new record (lv. 1199)

20. ### Zircean

Re: [Texmaster] Sudden Ti - Time Attack 0-300 ; 0-500 ; Section Time

I guess I'll update my records here: