Cleared 40 lines on 2007-07-21 at 13:03 (rot=TOD M4, lock=500 ms Move reset, rnd=7-piece Bag, spin=Off, speed=Game Boy) (grav=Cascade, drop=None, are=0 ms, das=183 ms 1G (60 Hz), shadow=Color, next=8 pieces) Played for 1:00.46 (active 0:53.9 Played 104 tetrominoes (103.19 per minute, 115.59 per active minute) Pressed 342 keys (3.28 per tetromino) Made 40 lines (single: 9; double: 5; triple: 3; quad: 3; x5: 0; x6: 0; x7: 0; x8+: 0) Sent 21 garbage (20.83 per minute) Left 12 blocks behind LJ score: 8200 herc, why not keep track of records for 180 seconds mode too? If you'll do it, here's mine Cleared 180 seconds on 2007-07-21 at 13:38 (rot=TOD M4, lock=500 ms Move reset, rnd=7-piece Bag, spin=Off, speed=Game Boy) (grav=Cascade, drop=None, are=0 ms, das=183 ms 1G (60 Hz), shadow=Color, next=8 pieces) Played for 3:00.00 (active 2:44.23) Played 288 tetrominoes (96.00 per minute, 105.21 per active minute) Pressed 1023 keys (3.55 per tetromino) Made 114 lines (single: 2; double: 7; triple: 4; quad: 19; x5: 2; x6: 0; x7: 0; x8+: 0) Sent 109 garbage (36.33 per minute) Left 4 blocks behind LJ score: 33200 Not so impressive. I found that I get a higher score when I just go for tetrises and not 8+s.
Huh... I feel pretty stupid now. I'd think LJ would be one of the ones that reward 5+ line clears differently. Is TNT64 the only one that does? If that's the case, maybe the records should be kept in TNT64 scoring since highscores in cascade mode with a scoring system that discourages actually using cascades... seems kinda counter-intuitive. Cleared 180 seconds on 2007-07-21 at 22:50 (rot=TOD M4, lock=500 ms Move reset, rnd=7-piece Bag, spin=Off, speed=Game Boy) (grav=Cascade, drop=None, are=0 ms, das=183 ms 1G (60 Hz), shadow=Color, next=8 pieces) Played for 3:00.00 (active 2:44.5 Played 281 tetrominoes (93.66 per minute, 102.44 per active minute) Pressed 986 keys (3.50 per tetromino) Made 105 lines (single: 6; double: 4; triple: 1; quad: 11; x5: 0; x6: 0; x7: 2; x8+: 3) Sent 0 garbage (0.00 per minute) Left 66 blocks behind TNT64 score: 24900
Shaved off another miniscule fraction of a second (I think this is about my limit... short of an extreme amount of luck for a MASSIVE cascade, this is about as fast as my brain can possibly operate <G>). Cleared 40 lines on 2007-07-27 at 05:17 (rot=SRS, lock=Move reset, rnd=7-piece Bag, spin=3-corner T, speed=Exponential) (grav=Cascade, drop=None, are=0 ms, das=183 ms 1G (60 Hz), shadow=Faint color, next=8 pieces) Played for 1:27.76 (active 1:19.96) Played 103 tetrominoes (70.41 per minute, 77.28 per active minute) Pressed 393 keys (3.81 per tetromino) Made 40 lines (single: 16; double: 9; triple: 2; quad: 0; x5: 0; x6: 0; x7: 0; x8+: 0) Sent 5 garbage (3.41 per minute) Left 12 blocks behind LJ score: 5000
Trimmed off another half a sec: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Cleared 40 lines on 2007-07-29 at 08:20 (rot=SRS, lock=Move reset, rnd=7-piece Bag, spin=3-corner T, speed=Exponential) (grav=Cascade, drop=None, are=0 ms, das=183 ms 1G (60 Hz), shadow=Faint color, next=8 pieces) Played for 1:27.20 (active 1:19.5 Played 104 tetrominoes (71.55 per minute, 78.40 per active minute) Pressed 407 keys (3.91 per tetromino) Made 40 lines (single: 17; double: 2; triple: 5; quad: 1; x5: 0; x6: 0; x7: 0; x8+: 0) Sent 7 garbage (4.81 per minute) Left 16 blocks behind LJ score: 5400 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Code: Result: Cleared 40 lines at level 40 on 2009-05-18 at 00:16 Played 102 tetrominoes in 0:50.13 (122.07/min) (active time only: 0:45.18, 135.44/min) Pressed 358 keys (3.50/piece) Made 40 lines (single: 15; double: 6; triple: 3; quad: 1; 5L: 0; 6L: 0; 7L: 0; 8L+: 0) Sent 15 garbage (17.95 per minute) Left 4 blocks behind LJ score: 7000 Options Well: 10x20, Enter: Above Speed: Zero, ARE: 0 ms Randomizer: History 6 rolls of Tetrominoes Hold: On, empty, Rotation: Arika Lock: Move reset, Deep: Off Line clear: 0 ms Cascade, Gluing: Off Drop score: None, T-spin: 3-corner T Garbage: Off, DAS: 116 ms 1G Soft drop: 1G Slide, Hard drop: Lock Shadow: Color, Next: 1 I was curious about the last thread in the records section. It looked interesting so I gave it a try. Sorry for bumping this back to the first page...
