You could still play 20G unrated if you suck at it. Or maybe getting a big dent in their rating from sucking at rated 20G is just the kind of reality check people like Corrosive need?
Um, no. Baxter is right. If "people like Corrosive" didn't like 20G, or sucked at it, they just wouldn't play it. Especially if it affected their 0G rating. In fact they'd stop long before it was able to make "a big dent". And if the 20G players look condescending, no one will be willing to play. I'd rather not have 20G rated if it's just gonna be the same few people from here playing. We should try to get a rated 20G that new players can get into, rather than try to be some exclusive 20G club. That's also why I don't think we should go with Shirase speeds, or enforce ARS. Though I do agree we should enforce DAS/step reset. I, for one, don't mind if the rating doesn't show up in the players list, as long as they can seen in the profile, and during 20G games as Deniax proposed. I also think separate ratings would encourage people who value their 0G rating to at least try it out. Also, I laughed at Amnesia's picture with 20G ratings. Baxter at 5165, and Amnesia at 6621. Edit: One thing that might just be me... When you guys play 20G vs. and you use hold, do you ever notice the piece doesn't get "stuck" when it should? Sometimes I rely on a piece's not-flat-side getting stuck in the stack so I can charge DAS without worry about overshooting, but it seems to fail sometimes in vs. Not even in the marathon modes though.
Ihave not noticed what you mention but maybe I should re-read 3 times your sentence and be sure to well understand it.. Kasumi you forgot a detail, I propose SHIRASE 0-100 but with an extented lock delay ! having a lock at 24 instead of 18 makes the game much easier, even more than DEATH 0-100.
